Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 12:50
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What happened to your school bully?
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Another huge U.S. airline faces bankruptcy risk - TheStreet
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
The closer a volcano is to erupting, the greener the trees around it look from space - Live Science
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What do you love doing for fun?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.